The impact of the boxed warning on the duration of use for depot medroxprogesterone acetate.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the impact of the Food and Drug Administration's boxed warning on the utilization of depot medroxyprogesterone (DMPA). METHODS: From the IMS Lifelink data (2001-2009), we identified DMPA and oral combined hormonal contraceptive (CHC) users without a prescription claim 6 months before and after the first and last claim. Episodes were defined as all contiguous claims with no more than 90-day DMPA or 30-day CHC between claims. Days' supply (CHC) and 90-day duration (DMPA) was used to determine episodes. We used interrupted time series to evaluate changes in the mean episode length and proportion of episodes >2 years before and after the Food and Drug Administration's November 2004 boxed warning. Stratified analyses by birth cohort were conducted. RESULTS: From 2001 to 2009, 126 528 DMPA and 651 356 CHC episodes were used for segmented regression. For the DMPA cohort, there was an immediate decline in the mean duration (-34.7 days [confidence interval: -45.4 to -24.1]) and episodes >2 years (-1.9% [confidence interval: -2.9% to -1.1%]) after the boxed warning. We did not observe any change in mean duration or episodes >2 years for the CHC cohort. The largest declines in mean duration and proportion >2 years were seen with the oldest women. CONCLUSION: We observed a modest decline in the mean duration and episodes >2 years for DMPA use immediately after the boxed warning not observed among CHC users. In the stratified analysis, we saw declines in the duration of use >2 years in all age groups, except adolescents who continue to use DMPA for longer than 2 years. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Effect of obesity on the effectiveness of hormonal contraceptives: an individual participant data meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this investigation was to assess the potential effect of obesity on the effectiveness of hormonal contraceptives (HCs). STUDY DESIGN: A meta-analysis was conducted using individual participant data directly from the Phase 3 clinical trials of combination oral contraceptives (COCs) rather than extracting summary data from literature. Trials selected were reviewed by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 2000 and 2012, conducted in North America, had more than six 28-day cycle equivalents of exposure, and had readily retrievable participant-level data. Contraceptive effectiveness was measured by the Pearl Index (PI: the number of pregnancies per 100 woman-years) in women aged 18-35 at risk of unintended pregnancy. The incidence rate ratio (IRR), a ratio of PIs for obese women (defined as body mass index [BMI] ≥30 kg/m(2)) compared to non-obese women (BMI <30 kg/m(2)) was calculated. A Cox proportional-hazard regression model with fixed and random-effects were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for unintended pregnancy in obese women compared to non-obese women. RESULTS: Seven clinical trials with COCs (N=14,024: 2707 obese and 11,317 non-obese women) met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. The PI for each trial varied: 2.05-5.08 for obese and 1.84-3.80 for non-obese women. The pooled PI estimated using direct weighted average method was 3.14 (95% CI: 2.33-4.22) for obese and 2.53 (95% CI: 1.88-3.41) for non-obese women. The pooled IRRs estimated using direct weighted average and Mantel-Haenszel adjustment methods were comparable: 1.37 (95% CI: 1.02-1.84) and 1.43 (95% CI: 1.07-1.92), respectively. The overall HR of 1.44 (95% CI: 1.06-1.95; p=.018) in the meta-analysis suggested a 44% higher pregnancy rate during COC use for obese women after adjusting for age and race. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: Obesity may increase the risk of unintended pregnancy in women using COCs; more data on obese women from ongoing and future Phase 3 clinical trials are necessary to allow further evaluation of this topic. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this meta-analysis suggest that obese women may have a higher pregnancy rate during COC use compared to non-obese women. Future analysis should assess differences in pharmacodynamics or compliance that could potentially account for the observed difference in unintended pregnancy rates.

Glucose tolerance and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in nulliparous women who smoke during pregnancy.

Gestational diabetes mellitus has been associated with adverse maternal and infant outcomes, including preeclampsia and fetal macrosomia. Although cigarette smoking has been associated with increased insulin resistance, its effect on gestational diabetes mellitus risk is uncertain. The authors evaluated the effects of smoking on glucose tolerance in a cohort of pregnant women who participated in the Calcium for Preeclampsia Prevention trial, a randomized study of nulliparous women conducted in five US medical centers from 1992 to 1995. Results of screening and diagnostic testing for gestational diabetes mellitus were analyzed. For 3,774 of the 4,589 women enrolled, plasma glucose concentration 1 hour after a 50-g oral glucose challenge and complete information on pregnancy outcome were available; for 3,602 of the women, gestational diabetes mellitus status was known. Adjusted mean 1-hour plasma glucose concentration (mg/dl) was elevated in women who smoked at study enrollment (112.6, 95% confidence interval: 110.0, 115.3) compared with women who had never smoked (108.3, 95% confidence interval: 106.7, 109.8; p < 0.01). Women who smoked were at increased risk of gestational diabetes mellitus when criteria proposed by the National Diabetes Data Group were used (adjusted odds ratio = 1.9, 95% confidence interval: 1.0, 3.6). These findings support an association between smoking and gestational diabetes mellitus.